Comments on: Lil Formers #151: The Captains’ Ball

By: April Giambanco

April Giambanco — Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:29:15 +0000

Hi, Excellent writing skills you have here! Also your web site loads up fast! Which helps very much. Please continue your enjoyable work. Cheers.

By: Triphammer

Triphammer — Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:15:36 +0000

He still exists….for now

By: Xalfrea

Xalfrea — Sun, 14 Nov 2010 13:55:53 +0000

LMAO, Janeway would actually be the one to call it out that nobody likes Archer.

Though yeah, even if TOS, TNG, DS9 and VOY aren’t technically erased from the timeline, hardly anybody doesn’t care about the old timeline anymore.

By: Baron

Baron — Fri, 21 May 2010 12:33:03 +0000

I’m actually confused on this one…Though I haven’t exactly kept up with Enterprise…Though from my understanding, wasn’t Enterprise supposed to be a prequel to TOS and everything else? You know, being the first starship to explore the endless void of space and to incorporate the new warp drive engine to make this all possible? Never understood all this alternate universe crap, until the new Trek movie, even then, according to reference that tends to happen, after Enterprise in retro spect..But what do I know, not much of a “Trekkie” they only had so many movies where the Enterprise (new and old) come into contact with each other through wormholes and time rifts…

By: Xodus27

Xodus27 — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:57:48 +0000

I am glad to see several others who also know of April. As far as continuity is concerned with ST: Enterprise, despite the claim that it was NX 01 or whatever, it was called Enterprise, right? If you can bear it, rewatch Star Trek: The Motion Picture (Soundtrack). Decker shows V’ger’s interface body pictures of the previous ships with the name, Enterprise. Do you see the NX? No, you don’t.

Sorry for the ranting, but it’s true.

By: Jimmy Alabaster

Jimmy Alabaster — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:21:20 +0000

Who’s DOES NOT EQUAL whose.

By: Yaro

Yaro — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 05:46:40 +0000

Except for starters, this is a alternate universe, almost like Ultimate in Marvel, it’s actually a different reality from what happened everywhere else in Star Trek. Technically all the adventures of the first four TV series still happened in the main timeline. I thought Neo Spock made that clear in the movie: The arrival of Nero caused a whole new timeline to open up. This is why Spock Prime or Nero just vanish or forget what happened when they arrived: Because in their universe it still happened. Nothing was erased.

By: cde

cde — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:49:27 +0000

If Enterprise ends about 102 years before Alt-Trek, how did Scotty teleport Admiral Archers prized beagle if its supposed to be porthos? Archer whould have to be about 130 at the time, and porthos…. 110 * 7 doggy years.

I know Scotty is damn good at teleporting magiks, but he aint THAT good.

By: hellfire

hellfire — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:11:00 +0000

kirk was meh i only liked the rest of the crew and Pike (wheelchair version though)

picard was good all round and they showed the chain of command better in that.

sisco was great even if the show played like a TV soap

janeway. well im just glad shwe was lost in the delta zone. she was a tool before the marque joined the ship and showed her how to relax and lead in 1.

and archer just fails it ruins the whole lore of the show with how they linked him and the xindi in.
also in relics the ship cleary state “there are 5 ships with the name enterprise) refrencing the NCC1701 class so making a NX to keep lore killed this great tribute to scotty episode.

god bless you Scotty. may you and the jhonable (spelt wrong?) find eternal rest amongst the stars where we have yet to go.

By: mslack

mslack — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:20:05 +0000

Packard’s team can still exist in the future of the Abramsverse, it’s just a matter of time.